Calculator
Exposure and ROI calculator
Hands-on tool · two minutes
Human risk exposure and ROI
Set your workforce and the incidents you saw last year. The calculator shows your exposure, the loss a human risk program avoids, the analyst hours it returns and a three-year view. Every assumption sits below the result, and you can change each one.
Incidents in the last 12 months that traced to a person
Pick the band you can defend. The result is a range from the low to the high end of each band.
Your estimate
Three-year view
Year 1 at 50% effect, then full effect- Exposure without a program (midpoint)
- Benefit: avoided loss plus analyst cost saved (midpoint; the mark shows low to high)
Three years: benefit $33k–$238k · set your program budget in the assumptions to see net and ROI
ROI = (three-year benefit − three-year program cost) ÷ three-year program cost. Benefit = avoided loss + analyst cost saved. The program cost is your own planning figure.
Every number you can change
Assumptions
Each default is a planning assumption with its basis. No market statistic is used. Change any value and the estimate updates.
- Fewer risky users after a human risk programassumption30%–50%
Planning assumption. Source: Cyentia Institute, State of Human Risk report, as Living Security publishes it: organizations using the Living Security platform saw their share of risky users fall from 43% to 21% in a year. Your result will differ; it is applied to incident counts in proportion.
- Share of that reduction still open to a "training and simulations" programassumption100%
Planning assumption: the 43% to 21% outcome describes programs that moved to a human risk platform from training and simulations. A behavior-based program already holds part of the effect, so the default is half; an existing platform, a quarter.
- Share of the workforce in risky cohortsassumption43% today, 21% after
Planning assumption from the same published 43% to 21% customer outcome. Used only for the people count; it does not change the dollar figures.
- Cost of one phishing click incidentassumption$2,500
Planning assumption for a response budget: cleanup, recovery and lost time, without your analysts' hours (counted separately). Replace it with your own figure; no breach-cost report is cited.
- Cost of one account takeover incidentassumption$15k
Planning assumption for a response budget: cleanup, recovery and lost time, without your analysts' hours (counted separately). Replace it with your own figure; no breach-cost report is cited.
- Cost of one business email compromise incidentassumption$50k
Planning assumption for a response budget: cleanup, recovery and lost time, without your analysts' hours (counted separately). Replace it with your own figure; no breach-cost report is cited.
- Cost of one data mishandling incidentassumption$10k
Planning assumption for a response budget: cleanup, recovery and lost time, without your analysts' hours (counted separately). Replace it with your own figure; no breach-cost report is cited.
- Upper bound for "many (20+)"assumption40 incidents
Planning assumption so an open band still gives a range. Set it to your real count.
- Analyst hours per incidentassumption6 h
Planning assumption for triage, investigation and cleanup by your own team. Set it from your ticket data.
- Loaded analyst cost per hourassumption$85
Planning assumption: salary, benefits and overhead for one analyst hour.
- Program cost per yearassumption$0
Planning assumption for your all-in budget: licences, people and content. This is your number; Living Security pricing is never stated here.
- Year 1 rampassumption50%
Planning assumption: a program reaches half its effect in the first year as sources connect and playbooks start, then the full effect in years 2 and 3.
- IndustryassumptionTechnology
Labels the report and routes the follow-up. It does not change the math.
Next step
See the estimate on your own signals
A 30-minute session checks the estimate against your incident data and shows the platform on the demo environment.
Planning estimate from your inputs and the assumptions above. No market statistic is used, and no Living Security price appears. The reduction basis is a planning assumption from the Cyentia Institute's State of Human Risk report as Living Security publishes it (risky users fell from 43% to 21%); change it above to match your own program.