CrowdStrike just launched an AI kill switch to terminate rogue agents and announced plans to acquire Fiddler AI and Dreadnode. The category of AI agent security is real, and the largest security platform in the market is telling every CISO so.
We hear the same thing in our meetings. GRC and Risk leaders are talking Falcon. They want agents governed, contained and accountable. They are right.
A kill switch is the last line of defense. It acts after an agent has already gone wrong. The question every security leader asks next is how to see the risk before the switch gets pulled.
Where each layer works
CrowdStrike Falcon sees what happens on the endpoint: process behavior, identity, telemetry, active threats. It detects and responds at machine speed.
Living Security sees what happens around the person and the agent: who is exposed, what they do, which behaviors create risk, which cohorts carry it, and whether the intervention worked. Every agent runs on behalf of a human. Every human now works alongside agents. That relationship is where risk starts.
Put the two together and you get:
- Detection and response from Falcon, at the endpoint
- Human and agent risk visibility from Living Security, across the workforce
- Targeted intervention that changes behavior before an incident
- Proof of risk reduction you can show your board
Additive by design
We connect to your security stack. We do not replace it. Falcon data flows into Living Security so risk reflects what is happening in your environment, not a generic training score. If you already run Falcon, your human risk program starts from endpoint signals you already collect. Teams use it to:
- Pinpoint the hotspots where human behavior and endpoint signals overlap
- Route the right intervention to the right cohort
- Show leadership which actions reduced risk and by how much
Your SAT owner gets a program tied to real signals. Your GRC and Risk teams get the evidence they need. Your SOC gets fewer incidents that start with a human decision.
Human risk management for humans and AI agents
Agents act with the permissions and context people give them. Governing an agent means understanding the person who deploys it, the data it touches and the habits around it. Human risk management extends to both.
Living Security measures behavior, connects it to business objectives and drives what actually mitigates risk. As agents join the workforce, the same discipline applies to the people who build, prompt and supervise them.
From reactive to preemptive
Reactive security responds after something happens. Preemptive security acts on risk while it is still a pattern. Falcon gives you speed at the moment of attack. Human risk management gives you foresight in the weeks before it.
That is the combination security teams are asking for: strong controls at the endpoint, and visibility into the human and agent behavior that feeds them.
If CrowdStrike is part of your stack, you already have half of preemptive security. Talk to us about the other half.
