60-80% of security remediation can be fully automated. If your team is still executing remediation by hand, it is paying for it in speed, coverage, and burnout. See a live demo to see automated human risk playbooks in action.
When a risk signal spikes, most security teams scramble. Someone triages the alert, writes a message, schedules training, and follows up weeks later. By then the behavior has repeated, the exposure has grown, and the incident has moved on to the next urgent item.
Human Risk Management (HRM), as defined by Living Security, closes that gap with automated human risk remediation. Automated playbooks execute routine remediation the moment a risk signal spikes, including targeted nudges in Teams and Slack, custom content, policy enforcement, and MFA re-enrollment, always with the security team in control.
Living Security, a leader in Human Risk Management (HRM), built Livvy to turn a defined playbook into an automated workflow. Define a playbook once, and Livvy executes it at scale, delivering 10X mitigation capacity without 10X the headcount.
Manual remediation does not scale. Every alert requires a human decision, a human message, and a human follow-up, and each step adds delay. While the analyst works down the queue, risk compounds across the workforce.
An automated playbook defines what happens when a specific risk signal fires. The Living Security Platform lets security teams define the workflow once, and Livvy executes it automatically whenever the trigger conditions are met.
The most frequent remediation tasks are also the most automatable. Living Security customers apply automation across phishing response, training compliance, policy enforcement, and access hygiene.
AI-powered security remediation is where automation meets risk intelligence. The platform does not just execute a fixed rule; it uses risk signals to decide who needs which response, and it learns from the outcome to improve the next run.
Living Security's platform automates 60-80% of routine remediation tasks. That automation is what lets teams achieve 10X mitigation capacity without growing headcount at the same rate.
The 60-80% figure matters because it defines the boundary between routine and complex. Routine remediation, ordinary nudges, standard training triggers, and common policy enforcement, is deterministic enough to automate safely. Complex cases, such as insider threats with legal implications or investigations that cross multiple systems, remain with the human team.
See automated playbooks in action. Watch the 30-second demo or see a live demo.
Automated human risk remediation is the execution of routine risk-reduction actions, such as nudges, training triggers, policy enforcement, and MFA re-enrollment, through predefined playbooks that run automatically when risk signals fire.
Living Security's platform automates 60-80% of routine remediation tasks, allowing teams to scale mitigation capacity roughly 10X without a proportional increase in headcount.
No. Automation handles routine remediation while keeping humans in control through review, adjustment, and override, and complex cases always escalate to the security team.
Teams that automate routine remediation stop paying the manual price in speed, coverage, and burnout. See a live demo to learn how Livvy turns a defined playbook into an automated workflow, or watch the demo video first.